MEC&F Expert Engineers : Stevens v. Santander Holdings USA Inc.

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Stevens v. Santander Holdings USA Inc.



Stevens v. Santander Holdings USA Inc.


Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Docket: 14-1481

Opinion Date: August 24, 2015


Areas of Law: Civil Procedure, ERISA, Insurance Law


During his employment with a subsidiary of Santander Holdings, Stevens received treatment for ankylosing spondylitis, a chronic inflammatory disease, and participated in a short-term disability plan (STD) and a long-term disability plan (LTD). 


When Stevens’ condition worsened, Liberty Mutual, the administrator of Santander’s plans, initially awarded STD benefits to Stevens, then determined that Stevens no longer suffered from a qualifying disability and terminated his benefits. 

Stevens sued under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1001. The district court found that Liberty Mutual’s decision to terminate Stevens’s STD benefits was arbitrary and capricious and remanded with instructions to reinstate Stevens’s STD benefit payments retroactively and to determine his eligibility for LTD benefit payments. 

The Third Circuit dismissed an appeal for lack of jurisdiction, finding that the remand order to the plan administrator was not a “final decision” appealable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1291 at that time. The district court retained jurisdiction over the case and the order is not yet appealable.