SPRAY POLYURETHANE FOAM (SPF) AND ISOCYANATES. HAVE YOU BEEN WARNED ABOUT THE POTENTIAL
HAZARDS?
We
provided in the link below a background information on the actual and potential
risks posed by the isocyanates. The
federal government and some states have started looking into these asthma and
contact dermatitis and opther health effects a bit more seriously. It was about time, as these chemicals need
closer scrutiny. Unfortunately, humans
will try to take advantage of other humans in moments of economic crises and
try to push their agendas or products.
This is the situation with SPF that was approved by Congress in 2009 to
make homes more energy efficient – same situation with fracking: destroying the landscape without
understanding the long-term effects in the name of jobs and lower energy
costs.
Now we find out (as we have expected) that there are severe repercussions for applying these chemicals inside our homes and businesses without adequate warnings or precautions. Did we learn enough from the health risks posed by PCBs and TCE and PCE and Chlordane and DDT and so on? We do not believe so. Now the chemists have replaced these banned chemicals with more chemicals. As we reported in an earlier blog, there are 4,000 or so chemicals being developed on a daily basis.
Now we find out (as we have expected) that there are severe repercussions for applying these chemicals inside our homes and businesses without adequate warnings or precautions. Did we learn enough from the health risks posed by PCBs and TCE and PCE and Chlordane and DDT and so on? We do not believe so. Now the chemists have replaced these banned chemicals with more chemicals. As we reported in an earlier blog, there are 4,000 or so chemicals being developed on a daily basis.
In March 2014, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) caused a minor uproar within the SPF industry by listing spray polyurethane foam as one of three materials included in a draft of the initial Priority Products List. The DTSC, which functions under the California Environmental Protection Agency, has developed the Priority Products List in compliance with its Safer Consumer Products Program.
Here
is what the U.S. EPA and other State Agencies are looking to accomplish:
- Accurate and comprehensive hazard communication throughout the product value chain, for workers and consumers.
- Accurate marketing claims.
- Best Practices as standard operating procedures to prevent exposures to isocyanates and other chemicals.
- Accurate exposure assessment of different types of applications & product formulations
- Measuring totalisocyanates
- Safe re-entry time –Duration of time after which occupants, residents, and school children can safely re-enter the premises after SPFI application
We do know that Spray Polyurethane Foam has energy saving attributes,
including:
·
High R-value -thermal
break
·
Moisture barrier (closed
cell)
·
Fills gaps and crevices
·
Stops air infiltration
Why is this Isocyanate Issue
Important?
·
One of fastest growing products in building and
construction.
·
Widely used as an insulation and sealant material
for weatherization.
·
Contains toxic chemicals that when reacted on-site can
create potential eye, skin, and inhalation exposures to anyone not wearing
appropriate personal protective equipment.
·
Many applicators, helpers, consumers, do-it-yourselfers
(often homeowners), and other decision makers are unaware of the potential
hazards from inhalation, skin and eye exposures.
·
SPFI component chemicals can migrate to other areas
of the building.
·
Homeowners have complained of off-gassing and ill
effects and some have had to vacate their homes.
·
Some marketing information is misleading –focuses
on “green” aspects and does not address potential hazards.
·
Often, material safety data sheets (MSDS) do not
contain consistent health and safety information.
·
There have been reports of home fires linked to
commercially available spray-foam installation (currently under investigation)
or demolition.
·
SPF application presents the same hazards as
spray-on truck bed liner operations (see NIOSH ALERT) and requires the same
level of protection.
·
Product composition, applicator technique, accurate
proportioning of SPF components, temperature, and humidity are important
factors that impact quality of foam, curing time and potential exposures to SPF
chemicals.
·
Often persons not wearing prescribed personal
protective equipment are in or near the work site.
·
It is difficult to find reliable guidance on
re-entry times.
SPF Chemical Composition
Side A
–Isocyanates
·
Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and pMDI
·
MDI –based isocyanates(varying species)
Side B –PolyolBlend(variable/proprietary)
·
Polyols(certain % bio-based)
·
Flame retardants
·
Blowing agents
·
Amine or metal catalysts
·
Surfactants
The combination of chemicals A and B on-site,
produces the foam.
A + B = POLYURETHANE FOAM
Side A -Concerns
Health
concerns for isocyanates:
Lung and skin sensitizers.
·
Leading attributable cause of work-related asthma.
·
Can trigger severe or fatal asthma attacks in
sensitized persons upon further exposure, even at very low levels. [NIOSH
Alerts in 1996 and 2006 to prevent asthma and death in workers exposed to
isocyanates]
·
MDI is a hazardous air pollutant under the Clean
Air Act.
·
The European Union has issued regulations to
prevent exposures to MDI in consumer products. http://www.isopa.org/isopa/uploads/Documents/documents/2009-02-16_MDI_EU_legal_Marketing_and_Use_Restr.pdf
Side B –Concerns
·
Amines (catalysts) are irritants and can cause
blurry vision (halo effect).
·
Some flame retardants are considered persistent,
bioaccumulative, and/or toxic.
·
Some blowing agents may contribute to global
warming or have health effects.
·
Often chemical identities are claimed confidential
so it is difficult to evaluate toxicity.
Other Considerations
·
Long term stability of polyurethane foam:Fully
cured polyurethane foam is not considered a problem unless disturbed.
·
Heating, welding, or grinding generates free
isocyanates and other hazards.
·
Fires and thermal degradation can generate and
release isocyanates, hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, and amines.
·
Reports of fires linked to SPF installation
·
Some marketing claims are misleading:“no
off-gassing,” “non-toxic” and “safe”
·
“green” and “environmentally friendly”
·
“plant-based” and “made from soy beans”
·
Labels may not provide information on toxic
chemicals in the product and overlook important safety information.
Exposures -Spray Application
·
Generates vapor, mist, and particulates exceeding
occupational exposure limits.
·
Isocyanates & amines can migrate to other rooms
or floors.
Exposures –Trimming Foam
·
Trimming, cutting, or scraping foam that is not
fully cured generates dust, particles that may contain isocyanates and other
unreacted SPF chemicals.
Exposures -Consumers &
Do-It-Yourselfers
·
Consumers, a growing market of Do-it-Yourself
applicators, are using one-component cansor two-component kitsfor sealing
cracks, as insulation, or creative arts.
·
Users are often unaware of the hazards and the need
to prevent skin, eye and inhalation exposures, and the proper type of
protection to use.
SPF Research Priorities
·
Validation of a standard test method to measure
total reactive isocyanates.
·
Monitoring and product analysis to determine worker
and consumer exposures to a variety of SPF products.
·
Evaluating SPF curing times and determining safe
re-entry as related to:
o
Effects of SPF composition, temperature, applicator
technique, and proportioning and mixing on curing
o
Presence of unreacted isocyanates on dust particles
after cutting.
o
Replicating real-life conditions to explore
ventilation and containment strategies.
o
Understanding the relationship between dermal
exposures to isocyanateand sensitization/ asthma.
o
Assessing long-term stability of SPF, including
during thermal degradation and deconstruction.
o
Supporting development of accurate biomonitoring of
isocyanate exposures and biomarkers for isocyanate sensitization.
o
Product Emission Testing
o
Worker Exposure Monitoring
SPF Research Projects –In Progress
·
Total Isocyanate Monitoring Method (NIOSH)
·
Draft Ventilation Guidance for SPF Application
(EPA)
·
Trimming/Dust study (Industry -CPI)
·
Ventilation Study (Industry –CPI)
·
ASTM WK 30960 -New Practice for determination of
volatile organic compounds, diisocyanates, oligomericisocyanates, and amine
catalysts emitted from spray polyurethane foam insulation (SPFI) products
designed for on-site application in buildings
·
International Conference on Isocyanates& Health
(early planning stages)
EPA Action Plan for MDI
·
EPA released an Action Plan for MDI in April 2011
·
Focus is on potential health risks to self-employed
workers and consumers from products containing MDI and related compounds.
·
Actions identified:
o
Data call-in for past allegations of significant
adverse health effects [TSCA Section 8(c)]
o
Obtaining unpublished health and safety data from industry
sources [TSCA Section 8(d)]
o
Requiring exposure monitoring studies for consumer
products containing uncured MDI [TSCA Section 4]
o
Potentially banning or restricting consumer
products containing uncured MDI [TSCA Section 6].
o
Cooperative and voluntary actions that promote
product stewardship and research; e.g., collaboration with other agencies and
the industry via the SPF workgroup
Metropolitan Engineering, Consulting & Forensics
(MECF)
Providing
Competent, Expert and Objective Investigative Engineering and Consulting
Services
P.O. Box
520
Tenafly,
NJ 07670-0520
Tel.:
(973) 897-8162
Fax:
(973) 810-0440
E-mail:
metroforensics@gmail.com
Web
pages: https://sites.google.com/site/metropolitanforensics/
https://sites.google.com/site/metropolitanenvironmental/
http://metroforensics.blogspot.com/
We are happy to announce the launch of our twitter account. Please make
sure to follow us at @MetropForensics or @metroforensics1
Metropolitan appreciates your business.
Feel free to recommend our services to your friends and colleagues.