MEC&F Expert Engineers

Friday, March 26, 2021

The brain of bald eagles and other birds were damaged by neurotoxins produced by cyanobacteria that came into contact with bromide

 


A lethal combination

Although many human activities have clear negative effects on the natural world, there are also unforeseen consequences. Bald eagle mass death events in the southeastern United States may be one such downstream effect of human activity. After considerable effort, Breinlinger et al. identified the cause of these events as an insidious combination of factors. Colonization of waterways by an invasive, introduced plant provided a substrate for the growth of a previously unidentified cyanobacterium. Exposure of this cyanobacterium to bromide, typically anthropogenic in origin, resulted in the production of a neurotoxin that both causes neuropathy in animals that prey on the plants and also bioaccumulates to kill predators such as bald eagles.

 Vacuolar myelinopathy (VM) is a neurological disease characterized by widespread vacuolization in the white matter of the brain. First diagnosed in 1994 in bald eagles, it has since spread throughout the southeastern United States. In addition to avian species such as waterfowl and birds of prey, VM has also been found to affect amphibians, reptiles, and fish. Despite intense research efforts, the cause of this mysterious disease has been elusive. Neither contagious agents nor xenobiotics were detected in deceased animals, but field and laboratory studies demonstrated that VM can be transferred through the food chain from herbivorous fish and wildlife to birds of prey.

============================

Athens, Ga. – University of Georgia researchers have formally identified and named toxic cyanobacteria that have been killing American bald eagles across the Southeast.

After years of studying the cyanobacteria coating the leaves of water plants in lakes, researchers in UGA’s Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources have determined that it is a previously undiscovered species in a new genus. In a paper published recently in the journal Phytotaxa, they named it Aetokthonos hydrillicola and lay out evidence that it is responsible for the eagle deaths.

“This new species has a growth form and gene sequence so unusual that it does not fit into any of the existing families,” said Susan Wilde, the Warnell professor who has been leading the research. “The naming convention for cyanobacteria is to use Greek for the genus—Aetokthonos translates to ‘eagle-killer.’ The species name is always Latin, and hydrillicola means ‘lives on hydrilla.'”

Beginning in the mid-1990s, American bald eagles started to die off in noticeable numbers from a neurological disease called avian vacuolar myelinopathy. AVM was first found in Arkansas in 1994, but over the past two decades, 160 eagles are known to have died across the Southeast from the disease, including 80 from one Georgia impoundment on the Savannah River, the J. Strom Thurmond Reservoir.

Researchers speculate the death toll is actually much higher because most of the dead birds are never found. And the deaths will continue to rise and spread to new locations, Wilde said, because “the invasive hydrilla and associated cyanobacteria spread to new lakes.”

Animals afflicted with AVM develop brain lesions that impair their motor skills, causing difficulty walking, swimming or flying. Once they consume the toxin, eagles suffer a neurological breakdown with unique holes in the brain and spinal cord, then death.

Wilde realized that in virtually every site where bald eagles died, there was an intense invasion of hydrilla, an invasive aquatic plant native to Asia and considered the ultimate aquatic weed in freshwater locations where it is found. She hypothesized that the eagles were eating tainted prey: waterbirds called coots eat the hydrilla, develop AVM, then pass it on to the eagles who prey on them as food. She just had to figure out why that was happening, and a close examination of the hydrilla led her to the culprit-blue-green algae coating the leaves of the very plants the coots were eating, confirmed at every location where birds were dying from AVM.

Over the past few years, Wilde has been collecting samples from every site of an AVM eagle death, taking slimy hydrilla to her Warnell lab for analysis. She found that Lake Thurmond near Augusta has the highest cyanobacterial concentration of the 20 confirmed AVM sites in six states.

Since 2008, she has been testing these samples using DNA sequencing, light microscopy, epiflourescent microscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy and other tests to identify its characteristics. She and her team originally placed the cyanobacteria in the order Stigonematales, but their tests show Aetokthonos hydrillicola is actually in a new genus and is unique even at the family level.

Wilde’s co-authors on the study include Jeffrey Johansen of John Carroll University, Dayton Wilde and Peng Jiang of the UGA department of horticulture, former Warnell student Bradley Bartelme now at EnviroScience, and Rebecca Haynie, a former toxicologist in Wilde’s lab now at the SePRO Corporation.

Aetokthonos hydrillicola’s growth is strange even for cyanobacteria. It forms large colonies that branch out horizontally and vertically on the hydrilla leaves but is not found in the water or sediment. Cyanobacterial blooms that cause wildlife, livestock and even human health concerns are increasing in recent decades and mostly occur in the water column. Another UGA project called CyanoTracker (http://www.cyanotracker.uga.edu/) has started to trace these cyanobacterial water blooms using social media. This new species associated with eagle deaths is hiding on the underside of the aquatic plants, so it is more difficult to detect.

In order to test the theory that the cyanobacteria is producing the neurotoxin that causes disease in birds, the researchers studied many lakes with hydrilla infestations. Some had the new cyanobacterial colonies on the leaves, but many did not. By monitoring both types, the researchers demonstrated only the lakes with Aetokthonos hydrillicola have birds suffering and dying from AVM.

Wilde said now that they have strong evidence for what’s causing the AVM deaths, she will need to find out what environmental conditions are promoting Aetokthonos hydrillicola.

“It’s already in lakes from North Carolina to Texas,” Wilde said, “and if it continues to spread, it could greatly undermine the bald eagle’s recovery and threaten other birds and aquatic wildlife. We already know that grass carp and turtles can develop the same AVM lesions, but we need to find out how it can affect the rest of the aquatic food web.”

A solution to stopping the spread of Aetokthonos hydrillicola might not be easy, but one idea involves releasing grass-eating carp into affected lakes, a tactic that was successful in Lake Murray in South Carolina, where 64,000 carp ate 3,880 acres of the invasive plant over two years. Unfortunately, she said, this non-native, sterile carp consumes other desirable water plants important for fish and wildlife habitat.

The study is available online at http://www.biotaxa.org/Phytotaxa/article/view/phytotaxa.181.5.1.

Thursday, March 25, 2021

US EPA Withdraws Plantwide Applicability Limit Permit for Limetree Bay Refinery in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Will Review Clean Air Act Requirements for the Facility



 

EPA Withdraws Plantwide Applicability Limit Permit for Limetree Bay Refinery in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Will Review Clean Air Act Requirements for the Facility

 

NEW YORK (March 25, 2021) – Amid concerns raised by and appeals filed by non-governmental organizations, members of the community and the company itself, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has withdrawn its Clean Air Act “plantwide applicability limit” (PAL) permit for the Limetree Bay Terminals and Limetree Bay Refining facility on St. Croix in the U.S. Virgin Islands originally issued by EPA on December 2, 2020. The Limetree Bay facility is located in a community with environmental justice concerns. Ensuring that the needs of overburdened communities are taken into account is a priority for EPA. The withdrawal of the PAL permit does not require the facility to discontinue operations.

EPA is reconsidering the PAL permit in light of information received during the permitting process and President Biden’s executive orders that federal agencies review environmental actions taken during the previous administration. EPA will undertake a thoughtful, timely, technical and legal review of the regulatory requirements applicable to the facility under the Clean Air Act that will engage a broad range of stakeholders. A Clean Air Act PAL permit like the one issued to Limetree Bay gives a regulated entity some flexibility for how it manages air pollution emissions from modifications at a permitted facility.

“Withdrawing this permit will allow EPA to reassess what measures are required at the Limetree facility to safeguard the health of local communities in the Virgin Islands, while providing regulatory certainty to the company,” said EPA acting Regional Administrator Walter Mugdan. “Today’s decision exemplifies good governance and EPA’s commitment to addressing critical environmental justice and economic concerns in the Virgin Islands with a broad range of stakeholders.”

While the PAL permit was issued on December 2, 2020, it never became effective under EPA regulations due to the timely appeals that were filed with EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) by a consortium of environmental and community groups as well as Limetree Bay itself. In their appeals, both sides asked that the permit be sent back to EPA so the Agency could consider their objections to the permit.

By withdrawing the permit today, EPA can consult with the affected parties, reassess the permit, and review the legal requirements applicable to the facility under the Clean Air Act outside of EAB’s process. EPA’s withdrawal renders moot the appeals of the permit to the EAB and withdraws the Agency’s responses to comments filed in support of the December 2020 permit.

 


The result of the withdrawal is that Limetree Bay, at this time, will not be afforded the operational flexibilities provided by the PAL provisions of EPA’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration regulations under the Clean Air Act. EPA’s withdrawal of the PAL permit does not affect Limetree Bay’s obligation to comply with existing Clean Air Act requirements, including multiple federal pollution control standards under the New Source Performance Standard and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants programs and various PSD permits issued by EPA. Limetree also has ongoing obligations under permits issued by the U.S. Virgin Islands. The facility is also subject to a Clean Air Act consent decree.

The Limetree Bay Terminals and Limetree Bay Refining facility is a complex, integrated petroleum refinery, consisting of refinery process units and various supporting operations including sulfur recovery plants, steam and electric power generation via boilers and gas turbine cogeneration units, wastewater treatment, and a marine terminal.

To read EPA’s withdrawal notice and for more information including a fact sheet, go to: https://www.epa.gov/caa-permitting/caa-permits-issued-epa-region-2#palpermits.   

Tuesday, March 23, 2021

Metropolitan Engineering, Consulting & Forensics (MECF)

 


Metropolitan Engineering, Consulting & Forensics (MECF)

Providing Competent, Expert and Objective Investigative Engineering and Consulting Services.

Our experts are multi-skilled, competent, and objective professionals who apply their analytical and common sense skills to reconstruct, determine the root cause, and document the events that give rise to property, casualty, and liability claims.  Thorough investigations and detailed measurements/research help us distinguish between pre-existing conditions and sudden and accidental losses.

Our investigations are:

·       Comprehensive & Accurate

·       Legible & Easy to Understand

·       Timely Performed

·       Delivered Quickly

·       Cost Effective

·       Clear & Concise

·       Developed by Professionals

·       Dependable

·       Our own uniform reporting system saves time and money.

Our Fast Track Investigation and Uniform Format Reporting systems allow us to conduct and deliver a comprehensive response to the assigned claim.  In most cases, we will obtain findings based on a site visit, visual observations, photographs, interviews, and field measurements.  Further investigations and testing will be provided upon request and approval by the client.

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

 








STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

 

APPLICATION

Conventional stormwater management infrastructure has been engineered to move the largest volume of water from a site as quickly as possible, collecting surface runoff in subsurface structures.2 Sustainable stormwater management captures water closer to the source, reducing combined sewer overflows (CSOs), ponding, and roadway flooding. In the process, rain water issued as an asset to improve urban ecology, microclimates, air quality, and the aesthetic quality of the public realm.

 

Sustainable stormwater management aims to achieve the following goals:

 

Improve water quality

Vegetated strips and swales filter and reduce sediment and filter pollutants through settling, physical filtration in the soil matrix, biological breakdown by microbes, and nutrient uptake by plants.

 

Detain stormwater flows

Stormwater runoff is detained in facilities such as flow-through planters, pervious pavements, and bioswales. Detaining the flows mitigates the peak flow rates from the rain event, which in turn helps reduce erosion, loss of nutrients, scouring, and load-carrying capacity.

Reduce stormwater volumes
Overall stormwater runoff volumes may be reduced by designing facilities that absorb and infiltrate rain water in place. Water-tolerant plant root systems maintain the porosity of the soil while taking up excess water in the stormwater facility.

Relieve burden on municipal waste systems
Sustainable stormwater systems reduce the amount of stress on a city’s wastewater treatment facilities, and may reduce long-term costs if applied at a citywide scale.4 Unlike traditional infrastructure, which does not add any additional value beyond its stormwater conveyance function, green infrastructure can be incorporated into neighborhood parks and landscaping.


Benefits and Considerations

Sustainable stormwater management can prove less costly than upgrading large sub-grade pipe networks, and allows for flexible, modular installation.

A 2007 U.S. EPA study found lower total costs for 11 of 12 green infrastructure projects when compared to equivalent grey infrastructure projects. The EPA study found the reliance on natural conveyance systems significantly reduced structural costs throughout the stormwater management chain. The opportunity to incorporate green infrastructure into other structures and landscaping also reduces the overall footprint of stormwater management infrastructure. Jeffrey Odefey et al., Banking On Green: A Look at How Green Infrastructure Can Save Municipalities Money and Provide Economic Benefits Community-wide (American Rivers, Water Environment Federation, American Society of Landscape Architects, and ECONorthwest, 2012).

Maintenance agreements are necessary to establish responsibility for the upkeep of the facility. Agreements may be secured through a specific city agency, neighborhood or business association, or be assumed by the adjacent business or property owner.

Facility design must account for the physical constraints of the site, the presence of subsurface utilities, the local climate, and the feasibility of maintenance agreements. An experienced geotechnical engineer should verify partial or full infiltration conditions of the native soils. Native soil conditions, site slopes, native plantings, and location within the existing watershed should all be considered in the design process. Infiltration facilities should only be located in Class A or B soils.


Footnotes

 “Low Impact Development (LID),” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, accessed June 3, 2013.

Noah Garrison and Karen Hobbs, Rooftops to Rivers II: Green strategies for controlling stormwater and combined sewer overflows (Washington, D.C.: National Resources Defense Council, 2011).

“Managing Urban Runoff,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, accessed June 3, 2013.

“Chapter 3: Fundamentals of Stormwater Management,” New Hampshire Stormwater Manual (Concord: New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, 2006).

“Deconstructing Green Infrastructure,” Erosion Control, accessed June 3, 2013.

“Why Green Infrastructure,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, accessed June 3, 2013.

Jeffrey Odefey et al., Banking On Green: A Look at How Green Infrastructure Can Save Municipalities Money and Provide Economic Benefits Community-wide (American Rivers, Water Environment Federation, American Society of Landscape Architects, and ECONorthwest, 2012).

Green City, Clean Waters: Green Infrastructure Maintenance Manual Development Process Plan (Philadelphia: Philadelphia Water Department, 2012).

Evaluation of Urban Soils: Suitability for Green Infrastructure or Urban Agriculture, (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011).

 

Monday, March 22, 2021

Bioswales are the most effective type of green infrastructure facility in slowing runoff velocity and cleansing water while recharging the underlying groundwater table.

CRITICAL DESIGN ITEMS

Bioswales require appropriate media composition for soil construction. The engineered soil mixture should consist of 5% maximum clay content.

Ensure that infiltration rates meet their minimum and maximum criteria. The engineered soil mixture must be designed to pass 5–10 inches of rain water per hour.

Verify that underlying native soils are not contaminated prior to implementation. Prior contamination may undermine the purpose of the facility and must be remediated before installation. Infiltration facilities should only be located in class A or B soils.

Bioswales have a slight longitudinal slope that moves water along the surface to allow sediments and pollutants to settle out. In-place infiltration then allows localized groundwater recharge. Ideal side slopes are 4:1, with a maximum slope of 3:1.

Protect adjacent subsurface infrastructure by maintaining minimum clearances. Install waterproof liners as separation barriers or construct a deep curb to separate the roadbed subgrade or parallel utility line from the facility.

Maintain a 5-foot minimum clearance from the bottom of the bioswale to high groundwater table.

Raise the overflow/bypass drain system approximately 6 inches above the soil surface to manage storms larger than the water quality event.

Runoff that enters the bioswale in a sheetflow fashion requires that the edge of the bioswale be flush with grade. Where curbs are necessary, intermittently space curb cuts to allow runoff to enter and be treated within the swale. Both sheetflow and curb cut systems must allow for a minimum 2-inch drop in grade between the street grade and the finished grade of the facility. Curb cuts should be at least 18 inches wide and spaced from 3–15 feet apart.

RECOMMENDED PRACTICES

Bioswales should be composed of diverse, native vegetation. Vegetation selection should consider species compatibility, minimum irrigation requirements, and the potential for wildlife habitat creation.

To reduce exit velocities and prevent erosion, use pretreatment exit energy dissipaters, such as rocks.

If the longitudinal slope exceeds 4%, utilize check dams, berms or weirs to create a step-down gradient. Limit the maximum ponding depth to 6–12 inches.

Discourage pedestrian trampling by using low curbs or barriers, or hardy vegetative ground covers.

Bioswales are not recommended in locations with low infiltration rates because standing water, localized flooding, and other issues can cause problems within the street and sidewalk in an urban environment