CAUSE AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS OF FAILURE OF TEMPORARY PIPE AND FLOWLINE CONNECTIONS AT FRACKING SITES
https://sites.google.com/site/metropolitanforensics/cause-and-contributing-factors-of-failure-of-temporary-pipe-and-flowline-connections-at-fracking-sites
There have been a number of fluid discharge incidents
and other accidents at gas production sites throughout the United States. Based on our forensic investigations, quite a
few of these releases have been caused by the failure of hammer unions or
hammer joints. Considering the
skyrocketing increase in the number of these gas production sites, and since
this is an on-going and recurring issue in the Oil & Gas, the chemical and
steel industries, it is important to advice the insured and the insurers on the
critical issue of mismatching and subsequent failure of hammer unions.
The danger
of mismatched hammer unions
Hammer
unions are connectors for flowline and temporary pipe installations. Sometimes people use them instead of the
flanged connection called for in the design.
Property
damage, injury and environmental release reports continue to come in involving
pressurized lines and the unions used on these lines. Workers have been observed mismatching unions.
In
addition, workers have been observed hammering on lines while still under
pressure. Several accidents within the
industries that use these unions, including fatalities, have occurred due to pressurized
lines being improperly connected or being hammered on while under pressure.
FMC acquired the original Weco company that used to make these unions in the 1950s. The design is old,
and used in steel and chemical plants, marine dredging vessels, strip mines and
the oil & gas industry. The problem
is that Weco had made quite a few of these unions using different design standards
they developed; in addition, there is no industry-wide standard. There is a real
potential for mismatch of the most commonly used hammer unions in the oil &
gas, chemical and steel industries: 2-inch
Figure 402, 2-inch Figure 602, 2-inch Figure 1002, and 2-inch Figure 1502. The 2” Figure 1502 will make-up
with 2” Figure 602 and 1002 and Guiberson 607.
You can
eliminate the hazards involved with the mismatching of the various unions, by
destroying 2″ 602 & 1002 Weco unions or old Guilberson Unions found in your
operation and use only 1502 Thread Halfs (female sub) Use only Unions supplied
by FMS and in good condition to ensure they hold rated pressure.
Recent
representative releases caused by mismatched hammer unions at gas sites
·
A failed hammer union resulted in (21) gallon spill
of production fluid that impacted the surface of the ground on the Well Pad. The
spill was discovered around 3:40 PM on 11/30/2013.
·
One
incident occurred when a 1502 wing nut male sub union holding a pressure sensor
was attached to a 602 female union on the mud pump. The 1502 union and
pressure sensor blew off the discharge of a mud pump. Another
incident occurred when one service company’s 1502 wing nut for the male sub was
made up to another service company’s 602 female half. While attempting to
test the surface casing, the rams were closed and the standpipe pressure
was slowly brought up. The intended test pressure was to be 1500 psi. When
the pressure reached 1300 psi, the 1502 union stripped out and blew off and
struck a third party service employee causing serious injury.
·
A spill occurred on 1/8/13. An unknown amount of re-use water was
released onto the ground. A hammer union
was leaking into the secondary containment of the frac tanks.
·
A spill occurred on 11/21/12 at 12:54 PM. According to the incident report, the result
of the release was due to a hammer union coming apart on the line to the
production tank associated with the E Bunnell 6H Well.
·
A
drill crew was drilling ahead when a third party pressure sensor attached to
the stand pipe stopped working. The sensor was made up to the standpipe
with a size “602″ hammer union rated at 6,000 psi working pressure. The
crew removed the faulty sensor and replaced it. The hammer union on the
new pressure sensor had a size “1502″ wing nut rated to 15,000 psi. The
“1502″ female threads in the wing nut appeared completely made up to the
“602″ male threads coming off the standpipe
·
A spill occurred on 2/1/2014 when a dump line froze
which caused a hammer joint to loosen and subsequently release production fluid
to the ground. Reported spill volume was
42 gallons.
Figure 1. FMC Hammer Union
The dangerous problem
The
thread (or male half) of a 2” 602
and 1002 hammer union will make-up to the wing nut (or female half) of a
2”
1502 hammer union leading a worker to believe he has mated two
compatible
components that will withstand fluid pressures up to 6,000 psi. As the
threads on the two halves are of the
same pitch and design, they will actually screw together. However,
because there is a 5/16” difference
between the diameters of the thread and wing-nut halves described above,
the
two mismatched components will not actually hold high pressures very
long. The hammer unions will eventually separate. When the union
halves blow apart three immediate
hazards are created:
1.
The wing-nut becomes an 8 lb. Projectile that moves in an undetermined
direction, maybe at personnel.
2.
Uncontrolled release of high-pressure fluids that may or may not strike
an employee in its path.
3.
Uncontrolled release of potential toxic
fluids (acids, oils, fuels, diesel base mud) that may cause harm to persons or
the environment.
Figure 2. Differences
between the 1502 and the 602 female sub
These hammer
union components have a history of failing under pressure due to incorrect
matching of components (pressure ratings and/or incompatible geometry).
The above list is
not meant to be all-inclusive and users should establish controls to ensure hammer
union combinations are safe, especially when more than one manufacturer’s
components are used.
The Recommended Procedure by the American
Petroleum Institute
The recommended
procedure (RP) alert by the API is intended to raise awareness of the
incompatibility and dangers of these hammer unions. Even though these parts mate up, they are
likely to fail below the working pressure of the hammer union segments (male and
female). Failures typically result in personnel injury or death in addition to
extreme equipment damage.
Figure 3. Compatible hammer unions. Note the smaller diameter of the lips of the male
sub.
The RP also
describes a recommended procedural solution to the industry that will reduce the
likelihood of a 2-inch Figure 402, 602, and/or 1002 hammer union component
being made up inadvertently to a 2-inch Figure 1502 hammer union.
Additionally the
RP describes and proposes an engineering solution to the industry that makes
impossible the mating of female 2-inch Figure 402, 602, and/or 1002 subs with
the wing nut of the 2-inch Figure 1502 hammer union.
It is important
that all users and suppliers adopt the procedural solution as it could possibly
be a number of years before the new hammer union designs are implemented and
the original hammer unions taken completely out of service.
Briefly, the
procedural proposals include using one or more of the following measures
depending on the fleet or equipment package:
•
Replace all 2-inch hammer union components to a
2-inch Figure 1502.
•
Use Go/No-Go gauges on all 2-inch female subs to
determine whether the component is acceptable for use with a 2-inch Figure 1502
male sub and nut.
•
Perform inspection and marking to ensure all
hammer unions are repaired or removed from service as required. Marking should
be either by stamping or branding and large enough to easily see.
•
Train all personnel on the hazards of mismatched
hammer unions and include identification of all components, wear and tear, and
out of service criteria.
•
Management of change process should be utilized.
•
Permit-to-Work (PTW) and/or Job Safety Analysis
(JSA) should be used in all work requiring hammer unions.
•
Jobsite inventory of hammer union component.
•
Color-coding
The RP also notes
that the engineering design solution is in three areas of the female sub:
1) reduced thread major diameter,
2) raised shoulder, and
3) a mark indicating the design.
Other areas
covered in the RP include mitigating the effects of mismatched components
parting, as well as several general safety recommendations.
The dangers of
mismatched hammer unions have been in the patch for far too long. But by following the recommended procedural
solution contained in this RP, as an industry, we can protect our workers to
the best of our ability while using hammer unions. It is of the utmost importance
that all employees are trained and retrained in the proper handling, use and
make-up of hammer unions.
Figure 4. Incompatible
hammer unions. Note the almost same
diameter of the male and female lips.
Metropolitan
Engineering, Consulting & Forensics (MECF)
Providing Competent, Expert and
Objective Investigative Engineering and Consulting Services
P.O. Box 520
Tenafly, NJ 07670-0520
Tel.: (973) 897-8162
Fax: (973) 810-0440
E-mail: metroforensics@gmail.com
We are happy
to announce the launch of our twitter account. Please make sure to follow
us at @MetropForensics
To
unsubscribe from future technical blogs and announcements, please reply to this
email with the word “unsubscribe” in the subject line.
Metropolitan appreciates your
business.
Feel free to recommend our
services to your friends and colleagues.
We know you need to process
damage claims quickly and knowing the facts is now faster than ever – within 24
hours of site visit. Our Pegasos Forensic Investigation Services (PFIS)
feature:
·
Expert Forensic Investigators on-site.
·
Defensible, Readable, Conclusive Reports.
·
Fixed-Prices starting at $499 per chimney or roof inspection
(volume discounts are also available). Flood loss assessments start at
$999.0. HVAC equipment only inspections start at $299 for local (within
one hour one-way drive) assignments.
·
10-State Coverage Area.
All of our employees and
associates are subjected to full FBI background investigations and security
clearance.