Feds approve the
Leidy Southeast pipeline expansion to accommodate Marcellus Shale
December 19, 2014 | 5:32 PM
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has approved an
addition to the interstate Transco pipeline that will help more Marcellus Shale
gas get to New Jersey. The Leidy
Southeast line is essentially a series of “loops” totaling about 30 miles
planned for both Pennsylvania and New Jersey. FERC overruled objections from
environmentalists who say the line would damage wetlands and farms. The $738
million project is part of a push to expand pipeline capacity in Pennsylvania
in order to transport Marcellus Shale gas to places of high demand. More
from NJ Spotlight:
The proliferation of new gas and other pipelines has become a
big issue in New Jersey, largely because many of the projects that have been
approved go through lands set aside with taxpayer funds for preservation,
including the New Jersey Highlands and the Pinelands Preservation Area.
Yesterday, the state Assembly approved a resolution with
bipartisan support (AR-191)
opposing a proposed oil pipeline that also would run through parts of central
Jersey. The Legislature is working on a bill (S-570) that would increase
compensation from energy projects on public lands.
The projects all are aimed at delivering cheap natural gas from
the Marcellus Shale formations in Pennsylvania to heat homes and power the
plants that produce electricity — both at significant savings.
____________________________________________________
Historically low natural gas prices and the public’s desire for
cleaner energy have fueled the growing popularity of natural gas. Clean-burning
natural gas currently produces one-third of all electric generation and heats
about half of all U.S. homes – and those numbers continue to climb.
Williams, a leading
energy infrastructure company, is developing an expansion of its existing Transco
natural gas transmission pipeline to serve the growing needs of local gas
distribution companies along the Atlantic Seaboard by late 2015. The Transco
pipeline is a major transporter of natural gas in the southeast and northeastern
United States.
The Leidy Southeast Expansion Project is designed to increase
the Transco
pipeline’s capacity by 525,000 dekatherms of natural gas per day (enough
natural gas to serve about 2 million homes). The proposal would involve the
construction of approximately 30 miles of additional pipe segments, called
loops, in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, in addition to modifying some existing
pipeline facilities.
Scope
As part of the Leidy
Southeast Expansion, Williams is proposing the construction of four new
pipe sections (loops), as well as making modifications to various existing
compressor stations and valve sites. The pipeline loops vary in length and are
expected to parallel the existing Transco pipeline, either completely within or
adjacent to the existing utility corridor. By maximizing the use of our
existing transmission corridor, our goal is to minimize the impact on property
owners and the environment.
Proposed Major Facility Modifications
|
||
State
|
County
|
Scope
|
PA
|
Luzerne
|
5.31 miles of 42-inch pipe (Dorrance Loop)
|
PA
|
Luzerne / Monroe
|
11.47 miles of 42-inch pipe (Franklin Loop)
|
PA
|
Luzerne
|
Existing compressor facility modifications
|
PA
|
Lycoming
|
Existing compressor facility modifications
|
PA
|
Columbia
|
Existing compressor facility modifications
|
NJ
|
Somerset / Hunterdon
|
6.92 miles of 42-inch pipe (Pleasant Run Loop)
|
NJ
|
Somerset / Mercer
|
6.18 miles of 42-inch pipe (Skillman Loop)
|
NJ
|
Mercer
|
Existing compressor facility modifications
|
Selecting Facility Locations
In developing the pipeline project, engineers attempt to
balance environmental and landowner considerations with the engineering requirements
for safely constructing a transmission pipeline. These factors include
geography, environmental concerns, collocation with other linear development
and constructability.
Sophisticated computer modeling is used to identify what new
pipeline facilities will be required to create the necessary pipeline capacity
requested by the project customers. Increasing natural gas deliveries can be
accomplished through one or a combination of the following:
Increasing horsepower at pipeline compressor stations or
building new compressor stations;
Replacing existing pipeline with larger pipeline;
Building new pipeline, either next to existing pipes or in an
area where pipelines don’t currently exist (sometimes referred to as
“greenfield” pipelines).
The pipeline company must evaluate a number of environmental
factors, including potential impacts on residents, threatened and endangered
species, wetlands, water bodies, groundwater, fish, vegetation, wildlife,
cultural resources, geology, soils, land use, air and noise quality.
Pipeline companies are strongly encouraged by federal
regulators to consider routes along existing corridors, such as pipeline rights
of way, roadways, utility corridors, railroad corridors and other easements.
After analyzing maps, aerial photos, environmental reports and
other available data, pipeline engineers establish a preliminary route or
location for the new facilities, as well as location alternatives.
Ground Surveys
Ground surveys are a preliminary first step in gathering
critical information that can be used in developing the pipeline proposal.
Initial ground surveys (environmental, cultural and civil surveys) for
the Leidy Southeast project began in November 2012. After receiving
permission from the landowner, each property is visited by various specialists
in land, engineering and environmental sciences. These may or may not be concurrent
visits but should not last longer than one or two days each. Some properties
may need to be revisited to obtain additional data. All information collected
will be used to help determine the best location of the proposed pipeline
facilities.
Permitting Process
Before any new pipeline facilities can be constructed, Williams
must first obtain a federal Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity
from the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC), in addition to various state and local
permits.
Pre-Filing
In January 2013 Williams requested that the FERC initiate a pre-filing environmental review of the proposed pipeline project. The project was assigned pre-filing docket number PF13-5. All pre-filing documentation can be accessed at the FERC website by referencing the pre-filing docket number.
In January 2013 Williams requested that the FERC initiate a pre-filing environmental review of the proposed pipeline project. The project was assigned pre-filing docket number PF13-5. All pre-filing documentation can be accessed at the FERC website by referencing the pre-filing docket number.
The FERC pre-filing process is intended to solicit early input
from citizens, governmental entities and other interested parties to identify
and address issues with potential facility locations. The company hosted a
series of public open houses during the spring of 2013 in the affected
areas to formally introduce the proposal to the public and solicit feedback.
Public input is important to the project and can shape the final
project footprint.
Filing of 7(c) Applicaiton
Williams filed an application with FERC on Sept. 30, 2013, seeking approval to construct the Leidy Southeast project.
The Certificate Application is a comprehensive document that
describes the proposed project, its need and potential environmental impacts.
The project was assigned Docket Number CP13-551. All documents and
correspondence submitted to or issued by FERC regarding the project can be
accessed by referencing the Docket Number on the FERC website located at http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp.
Schedule
January 2013 – Detailed civil surveys began and are ongoing
January 2013 – Pre-filing process began
April 2013 – Open houses and informational meetings
Summer 2013 – FERC scoping hearings
Summer 2013 – Submit draft environmental reports to FERC
September 2013 – Submit 7(c) application to FERC
Fall 2014 – Proposed compressor station construction start
Spring 2015 – Proposed pipeline construction
start
December 2015 – Target in-service
Our Commitment
Williams is committed to working with landowners, as well as
local, state and federal agencies, to design and construct the project in a manner
that minimizes environmental and landowner impacts. The company
is committed to extensive public outreach in advance of submitting our
application to the FERC. Our goals are to:
Generate a broad awareness of the project, its purposes and
value to the region’s economy and to meeting the future energy needs of the
state and region.
Ensure that community residents and a broad range of
stakeholders have ample opportunity to understand the process and their rights,
ask questions, voice concerns and present ideas about the project.
Create an atmosphere of openness, disclosure and public
dialogue in which we can respond to questions, concerns and suggestions
presented by the community and other stakeholders.
Contact Us
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us anytime.
Toll-free hotline: 866-455-9103
Email: PipelineExpansion@williams.com
Email: PipelineExpansion@williams.com
You may also call or write our land office:
95 Highland Ave, Suite 150
Bethlehem, Pa. 18017
610-419-9145
Bethlehem, Pa. 18017
610-419-9145
______________________________________________________
Environmental Assessment for the Leidy Southeast Expansion
Project (CP13-551) Issued August 11, 2014
The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission or FERC) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the
Leidy Southeast Expansion Project (Project). The Project is proposed by
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (Transco). The Project would expand
the natural gas delivery capacity to the northeast region of the United States
by up to 525,000 dekatherms per day. The proposed facilities associated with
the Project include the following:
·
about 29.8 miles of new 42-inch-diameter
pipeline loop in four separate segments in Mercer, Somerset, and Hunterdon
Counties, New Jersey, and Monroe and Luzerne Counties, Pennsylvania;
·
additional compression and modification of
existing Compressor Stations 205, 515, 517, and 520 in Mercer County, New
Jersey, and Luzerne, Columbia, and Lycoming Counties, Pennsylvania,
respectively;
·
modification of existing compressor stations in
North Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland; and
·
modification of existing meter and regulating
stations, mainline valves, and pig launchers and receivers in North Carolina,
Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Maryland.
The EA has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental
Quality regulations for implementing NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR]
1500–1508), and FERC regulations implementing NEPA (18 CFR 380).
The conclusions and recommendations presented in the EA are those of the FERC environmental staff. Input from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), as cooperating agencies, was considered during the development of the staff’s conclusions and recommendations. Although the cooperating agencies provided input to the conclusions and recommendations presented in the EA, the COE will present its own conclusions and recommendations in its Records of Decision or determinations for the Project.
The FERC staff concludes that approval of the proposed Project, with appropriate mitigating measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Potential impacts would be reduced with the implementation of Transco’s proposed minimization and mitigation measures and the 25 additional measures recommended in the EA. These conclusions are supported by the following:
The conclusions and recommendations presented in the EA are those of the FERC environmental staff. Input from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), as cooperating agencies, was considered during the development of the staff’s conclusions and recommendations. Although the cooperating agencies provided input to the conclusions and recommendations presented in the EA, the COE will present its own conclusions and recommendations in its Records of Decision or determinations for the Project.
The FERC staff concludes that approval of the proposed Project, with appropriate mitigating measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Potential impacts would be reduced with the implementation of Transco’s proposed minimization and mitigation measures and the 25 additional measures recommended in the EA. These conclusions are supported by the following:
·
Transco would obtain all necessary federal
authorizations prior to commencement of construction;
·
consultation required by Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act, and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
is completed; and
·
Transco would reduce and mitigate impacts on
natural resources and public safety during construction by implementing
Project-specific plans, which include the following: Comprehensive Rock
Handling Plan for the Princeton Ridge Segment of the Skillman Loop; Construction
and Restoration Plan Developed Specifically for New Jersey State Planning
Areas: Environmentally Sensitive Area 5 and Fringe 3, Along the Skillman Loop;
Erosion and Sediment Control Plans; Spill Prevention, Control, and
Countermeasures Plan; and Horizontal Directional Drill and Contingency Plan.
Comments on the EA must be received in Washington, DC on or
before September 10, 2014. The FERC Commissioners will take into consideration
staff’s recommendations and comments received when they make a decision on the
Project.