Saturday, January 31, 2015

Visteon Corp. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh



Visteon Corp. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Docket: 14-2725
Opinion Date: January 23, 2015
Areas of Law: Civil Procedure, Environmental Law, Insurance Law
Visteon, a worldwide manufacturer headquartered in Michigan, sued National Union, from which it had purchased liability insurance between 2000 and 2002. 
The policy excluded liability resulting from pollution caused by Visteon, except liability arising from a “Completed Operations Hazard.” 
In 2001, the toxic solvent TCE that was used to clean machinery in Visteon’s Connersville, Indiana plant was discovered to have leaked into the soil and groundwater. Neighboring landowners sued Visteon. 
National Union has refused to indemnify or defend. Indiana does not enforce standard pollution-exclusion clauses. Michigan law does enforce the more general kind of pollution-exclusion clause found in the policy. 
The district court ruled that Michigan law governed and held that Visteon was not entitled to coverage under the Completed Operations Hazard clause. The Seventh Circuit affirmed. 
The risk materialized in Indiana, but that could not have been foreseen. The Indiana victims were compensated by Visteon, and it is unclear what benefit the state would have derived from reimbursement of Visteon’s costs by National Union.” 
The court rejected Visteon’s argument that its “work” was “completed” each time a contract to supply products made at the plant was performed and concluded that the exception did not apply.